Expedition Bigfoot Team Collects Unexpected DNA Evidence

Our site is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate and member of other affiliate programs, this post may feature links that earn us a commission. Learn more about our affiliate policy here.

 

Expedition Bigfoot Ronny and Mireya
Ronny LeBlanc and Dr. Mireya Mayor examine evidence collected from the tree structure they found the night before. Courtesy discovery+

The Expedition Bigfoot team collected surprising DNA evidence while in the field searching for the most famous and elusive cryptid, Bigfoot.

Throughout their two-month journey, the team —Bryce Johnson (expedition operations), Dr. Mireya Mayor (primatologist), Russell Acord (ex-military/survivalist) and Ronny LeBlanc (Bigfoot researcher)— used the latest in advanced technologies to narrow their search within the designated target zones. They started in Kentucky and then switched mid-expedition to Washington State.

As the investigation intensified, possible evidence that Bigfoot may have been in the area surfaced. This included vocalizations, unexplained structures commonly described by Bigfoot witnesses and massive 16-inch footprints that no man could have left behind.

eDNA Evidence from Kentucky

During filming deep in the wilderness of Kentucky’s Appalachian highlands, the team collected eDNA from soil under a massive tree structure found by Dr. Mayor and LeBlanc. It produced surprising and exciting results.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is the genetic material naturally left behind by animals in the environment. Scientific analysis of these samples helps generate a snapshot of any living creatures. This revolutionary new tool is increasingly used to confirm the presence of elusive animals.

“This scientific expedition may have finally taken one of the world’s greatest mysteries out of the pages of legend and lore and into reality,” said Dr. Mayor.

The eDNA Analysis

Miroslava Munguia Ramos, project manager at the UCLA California Environmental DNA program, has analyzed the eDNA sample from the tree structure. Following are her observations:

“We received soil samples from your team and took a few months to get them processed. What we’re looking at are the unique organisms that we were able to identify. Our software does what’s known as metabar coding. So, it’ll match up all the DNA sequences that we were able to detect and try to cross reference them with the thousands of genomes that have been published and it’s pretty common that when we’re looking at environmental DNA samples, we detect humans, because there’s going be human traces almost everywhere.”

“But what I found very interesting was that, yes, we have detected human DNA in these areas, but we’re still seeing different primate DNA. There wasn’t just one human primate, there are several different primates, some sort of primate relative that exists in the data.”

“Pan troglodyte is a species of chimpanzee, which you would not see in the areas you’re at. It’s a real head scratcher. It’s important to note that the higher the detection, the more confidence we can say that whatever organism, whatever taxonomy we’re looking at was apparent in the area. And in this case, we’re looking at the Pan genus, or the chimpanzee genus…. there’s 3000 reads.”

“The technology is constantly improving, it’s getting more accurate, and now it just really comes down to making sure we have enough samples and we’re confident that whatever we’re studying is a unique species.”

Dr. Mayor’s Thoughts

Dr. Mayor expanded on this unique discovery:

EXPLORE MORE:  Cindy Kaza Replaces Amy Allan on New Season of The Dead Files

“Finding what appears to be a very large structure, seemingly created with intention and requiring great strength as well as foresight, is interesting. It is not unheard of for primates to stack sticks or rocks, although for me, the jury is still out as to what that was. There is no guess work in science. It is great is that eDNA was collected from that site. That may give us the answers we are looking for.”

“The process of describing and confirming a new species is difficult. DNA is absolutely essential in the scientific community to prove that something is a new or recognized species. You have eyewitness accounts from tens of thousands of people who say they have encountered Bigfoot, some coming forward with blurry videos and photographs. But that is just not going to cut it. What we need is indisputable genetic evidence to really put this mystery to rest. And there’s no doubt in my mind that we are headed in the right direction.”

Watch the DNA Evidence Episode

What does this all mean? Will the DNA evidence prove they found Bigfoot?

Possibly.

One thing it seems they didn’t find, though, is a humanzee (human/chimp combo). But it could be a new and as yet unidentified species of chimpanzee. That’s pretty exciting!

Expedition Bigfoot is currently streaming on discovery+. The series finale, “New Discoveries,” featuring the newly found eDNA evidence premieres on Sunday, March 28.

For More Info

Visit discoveryplus.com.

Check-In

Do you think Bigfoot wants to be found or is he so elusive because he’s smarter than we give him credit for and doesn’t want to be found by us?

2 Comments

  1. I don’t think Bigfoot wants to be found. Bigfoot has had many opportunities to pose for pictures and not run off in a blurry photo/video. Clever species.

  2. Author

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA! You’re comments always delight me, but some make me think, some make me laugh, and others make me do both, like this one. Oh, and I’m sitting here applauding you too!

Check-In

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.